Jonathan Parke, former head of commissioning at RGT, now director of Sophoro Ltd.
The accountable Gambling Trust (RGT), the UK’s leading problem gambling advocacy group, has found itself in the harsh glare of the media limelight again, this time for allegations of nepotism.
The charity, which is funded by the bookmaking industry to the tune of $5 million each year to research and promote the prevention of problem gambling, has been under fire in the British press recently for apparent conflicts of great interest. Because of its close ties to the gambling industry, concerns have now been asked as to whether its scientific studies are fully separate of video gaming passions.
The RGT maintains it is impartial. But the revelation this week by the united kingdom’s Independent newspaper that a firm owned by the husband of the charity’s Director of Commissioning, Jane Rigbye, has been granted a research that is lucrative, isn’t assisting the cause of credibility for the outfit.
According to the Independent, Sophoro Ltd. owned by Rigbye’s spouse Jonathan Parke, happens to be offered a major research agreement as part of a £750,000 initiative into the effect of online video gaming on issue gambling.
Parke was previously mind of commissioning at RGT himself, leading to accusations he and their wife swapped jobs, then promptly swapped contracts.
Sophoro ended up being granted the contract in the first of two, but until last year the company was registered at the couple’s family home, and both Rigbye and Parke were listed as company directors december.
Also, Sophoro bid for the RGT agreement simply two months after Rigbye stepped down as director to take on her brand new role at RGT.
In response to the news headlines, Labour shadow gambling minister Clive Efford said RGT ‘should be disbanded’ if its research ended up being found to protect the ‘interests of the industry at the cost of individuals with gambling problems.’
Goulden Steps Down
RGT has always been accused of being too sympathetic to the industry, and in particular for its refusal to denounce fixed-odds gambling terminals (FOBTs) in bookmaking shops.
Last thirty days, Neil Goulden, the trust’s president, stepped criticism that is down following The Guardian newspaper that while chair of RGT, he had been also a chair regarding the industry lobby group known as the Association of British Bookmakers (ABB). The positions had been held concurrently between 2012 and mid-2014.
Goulden told the Guardian that RGT, and the participation to his participation of the industry as whole, was integral to investigating and ultimately understanding problem gambling.
‘[Bookmakers] wouldn’t normally have released data or have taken the actions it continues to ingest prevention of damage without my personal influence and urging,’ he stated.
RGT, which may very well be investigated by the charity regulator throughout the Sophoro event, told the Independent that Rigbye had no say in commissioning of research agreements.
DraftKings Appeals New York AG Lawsuit, Filing Says Empire State Should Ban Spelling Bees
New York AG Eric Schneiderman, who has been accused by DraftKings of making errors in his lawsuit against DFS sites. (Image: pokerhomegames.com)
DraftKings has launched its appeal against the nyc State preliminary injunction that seeks to ban day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS) and put an end to its operations in the Empire State.
The DFS operator’s 67-page filing pulls no punches, accusing nyc Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of appropriate misapprehensions that ‘did not come close to carrying the burden’ of proof that DFS is not a game of skill.
It further accuses the court of ‘abusing its discretion’ in siding with Schneiderman.
‘The court applied the wrong legal standard, and ignored the undisputed evidence, in finding that daily fantasy sports contests are games of chance,’ the company argued in its filing.
Can be An Entry Fee A bet?
In December, Justice Manuel Mendez granted the AG’s injunction, ordering DraftKings and FanDuel to cease operations in New York State, its second-biggest market after California.
DraftKings immediately filed a motion that is expedited remain the court’s choice pending the results of its appeal. This was upheld by a Court of Appeals judge that same afternoon, permitting the companies to continue business temporarily in nyc until the case is remedied.
In his December ruling, Mendez was required to determine whether DFS had been a game of skill or of chance, and more specifically, whether setting a line-up was a process that is skill-based an ‘entry fee,’ or an out-and-out ‘wager.’ He decided it was the latter.
‘New York State law that is penal not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ instead it states that someone, ‘risks one thing of value,» he said. ‘The re payment of an ‘entry fee’ because high as $10,600 using one or more competitions daily could certainly be deemed risking ‘something of value.’ ‘
Dog Shows and Bass Fishing
DraftKings’ appeal filing claims that if this were the situation, then ‘dog shows and bees that are spelling yachting tournaments and bass fishing’ is ‘criminalized’ under Judge Mendez’s ruling. Each among these are events entry that is requiring whose outcome is vunerable to a component of chance, argues the DraftKings filing.
‘Daily fantasy sports are skill-based games which can be, and may be, legal,’ DraftKings’ attorney David Boies said in a statement. ‘DraftKings competitions are believe it or not legal than season-long dream sports, that your Attorney General has repeatedly conceded are legal.’
In January, Schneiderman amended their lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel to look for the return of all the buy-ins paid by New York residents paid to both companies throughout 2015, plus a $5,000 fine head that is per.
With 600,000 DFS customers in the state, this would represent hundreds of millions of bucks in buy-ins, plus around $3 billion in fines.
Outrage Over NFL-Owned Youngsters Daily Fantasy Sports Site from Youth Advocacy Group
The NFL kids daily fantasy sports site is facing backlash from a few outraged groups, arguing the league should not be marketing their product to children who are only six years of age. (Image: fantasy.nflrush.com)
Targeted at pre-teen kids, day-to-day fantasy activities (DFS) site NFL Rush is being expected to cease operations by the non-profit company Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC).
In a story that might appear appropriate for satire, the fact is that the National Football League is catering to kids to be involved in free DFS contests, with the chance of winning regular prizes like an XBOX One, video games, and a grand prize of the $5,000 scholarship.
In line with the NFL Rush Fantasy website, ‘US residents between 6 and 12 who have actually parental consent are eligible.’
Though the league and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, have long publicly opposed sports betting and gambling, it evidently does not have any qualms when it concerns children and dream sports. The CCFC is calling on Goodell and the NFL to stop marketing fantasy football to children in conjunction with the National Council on Problem Gambling.
‘ There is evidence that playing fantasy sports, particularly with the incentive of valuable prizes as offered on the NFL Rush Fantasy app and website, can lead to problem gambling and addiction,’ CCFC Executive Director Josh Golin said in his letter to your league. ‘It is unconscionable that the NFL encourages kiddies as young as six years of age to develop the habit of participating in this adult activity.’
The NFL has always maintained that any expansion of traditional sports betting could impact the league negatively and compromise the integrity of its games. Surprisingly, it is taken a stance that is rather different daily fantasy contests.
FanDuel has contracts with 15 NFL groups, while Dallas Cowboys and brand New England Patriots owners Jerry Jones and Robert Kraft hold stakes in DraftKings.
DFS varies from sports gambling as a result of the actual fact that the participant isn’t just picking a team or line, but assembling a roster of players in a procedure that is known as to be an endeavor that is skill-based.
Multiple attorneys general have ruled that DFS constitutes gambling, using the operators themselves, not interestingly, fighting straight back. The statistics on who routinely wins DFS contests seems to help the skill over luck debate.
But as 888 casino promotion code 2016 it applies to children, teaching 6 to 12-year-olds how to assemble a team of players to offer the most effective odds of winning a video game console is cause for concern certainly.
‘By providing these valuable incentives, the NFL is indoctrinating kids into engaging in dream recreations by having a financial stake in the outcome,’ the CCFC noted. ‘This exposes them, and our communities, to the potential risks of gambling dilemmas.’
You’ve Got to Be Carefully Taught
It must be noted that the NFL hasn’t just promoted a site that is online it’s offered an in-classroom curriculum for instructors because well. Launched in 2014, NFL Rush Fantasy understand, Play, Score! was billed as a language and math arts course based around fantasy sports. The league says that the program wrapped by the end of 2014-2015 season, however in it, young ones were encouraged to ‘choose their fantasy that is ultimate team week’ through critical thinking.
This system did employ basic math in determining just how fantasy that is many should be allocated based on the ball player’s performance, nonetheless it also required the student to comprehend the rules of soccer. Critics of the scheme argued it’s the NFL’s way to engage an audience that is new as youth soccer involvement continues to decline.
Hey, then just teach the worthiness of a dollar with a ‘Let It Rain’ mathematics program as well?
No Safeguards for Guardians
In the event that you’re thinking NFL Rush features a few protections to prevent kids from registering by themselves, you are going to be surprised to discover that registrants are simply just required to produce their parent’s email address, therefore that the NFL can validate their age and guardian permission.
Surely no 10-year-old would think to enter their friend’s email or develop a yahoo that is quick to self-confirm their validation, right? Of course maybe not.
From on the web poker to the emergence of daily fantasy sports, the main concern for a lot of legislators is just how to best protect adult consumers while gaming on the Internet, as well since the really issue of age verification. However, in the case involving kiddies, the most susceptible and impressionable demographic, small is being done to keep your way-under-18-year-old child from participating in daily fantasy activities.
Interestingly, no one from the pro-RAWA contingent seems to have jumped on this web site as evidence that children will not be exempt from gambling online. It’s exactly the kind of fodder that Sheldon Adelson and the bill’s other sponsors, like presidential GOP contender Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), would want to throw in the face of everyone who supports Internet gaming.